Don’t Forget, Keith Olbermann is a Tool

It bears repeating, seriously.

After this clip I think it’s safe to say that Keith Olbermann has gone off the deep end. Way, way, way off the deep end.

Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy

So let me lay out Olbermann’s logic for you. If someone criticizes another human being and then that human being is murdered, the person who criticized them bears responsibility.

That’s what Olbermann is literally saying here. He’s saying that because Bill O’Reilly reported facts about Tiller and then displayed disgust for what Tiller was doing, somehow he and Fox News are to blame for Tiller’s assassination. He event says that Bernie Goldberg is to blame for the guy who shot up the Unitarian church because he said he wanted to kill everyone in Goldberg’s book.

If O’Reilly had called for the assassination or death of Tiller Keith might have a point, but he didn’t do that, the worst he did was refer to him as “Tiller the Baby Killer.” This once again displays that Olbermann is nothing more than a far left political hack. Instead of blaming the people who pulled the trigger he’s blaming a news network that simply reported facts.

Towards the end Olbermann starts grabbing at straws, well that’s basically the whole seven minutes, but you catch my drift. He says that “most” bars, restaurants, and places of businesses show the Fox News Channel and that his crazy barely one million viewers should boycott these establishments.

First, I find quite the opposite, most places don’t show Fox News, and second, Olbermann gets just over one million viewers a night, that’s not even a percent of the population. If he thinks his little “indirect boycott” of Fox News is going to do any good he’s dreaming.

The ironic thing in all of this is that according to Olbermann’s mind numbingly retarded logic, if someone assassinated Bush Olbermann would be to blame!

Imagine that.

–jb

H/T: Hot Air

One Comment

wayne  on June 2nd, 2009

Watching O’Reilly or Olbermann is simply watching the two partisan sides of the same coin. They both mouth off their political opposites and they both get facts demonstrably wrong. They fulfil a highly partisan market share for both sides, most people who actually swing election outcomes realise this.

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.