The Common Sense of the Oil Debate

Oh the things $35 could buy me.

I think that every time I stick that small metal gas pump into my car and watch as the digital numbers climb.

I hate wasting money; in fact I’m not sure I’ve met anyone who is fancy with the idea of wasting money, there’s nothing more frustrating.

Now, I understand that gasoline is a necessity in my life; I suppose I could take public transportation, but have you been on a public bus lately? I fear contracting herpes if one drives by my car.

Maybe I sound like a privileged brat, but I like driving my car, I enjoy controlling my travel, I enjoy listening to the music I want, and driving the speed I desire.

So it’s frustrating that gas has become a wasteful expense, and the worst part is it shouldn’t be.

Do you know how gas prices are determined? It’s actually kind of complicated, but I’ll attempt to make it as easy as possible. There’s a bunch of dudes that run a bunch of countries that make up the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries, or OPEC. These dudes have a meeting and they examine the demand for their product (oil), and how much they’d like to make (really great job huh?). Then they determine how much they should produce in order to get the amount per oil they want.

Yup, it’s really that simple. Obviously there’s more to it, but as of late it appears that’s the way these guys operate. They feel like oil should be $100 a barrel, so what the hell? Let’s make it $100. Why not? I will clarify one thing, they don’t simply snap their fingers and raise the price, they achieve it by reducing or increasing production, which then drives the market to increase or decrease the price (it’s the basic principle of supply and demand).

OPEC wields a lot of power, after all they are responsible for 40% of the world’s oil production, and without them we wouldn’t be driving our cars around, at least not for $3 a gallon. So we don’t want to make OPEC angry, but at the same time we’re not going to get pushed around by them.

Oil prices are as much a political issue as they are an economic issue (you’ll find that those two are normally all tangled up together). When gas prices spiked in 2007 and 2008 many people blamed Bush, I’m sure you’re all shocked. But in reality there’s not a lot the president can do about gas prices, he could meet with OPEC and attempt to get them to amp up production, but these dudes are set in their ways, and they’ll control their output to get the desired effected on the input into their wallet.

Gasoline prices are going to become a massive issue in the coming year, there’s no sign that OPEC wants oil prices lower than $80 a barrel, and the economy doesn’t appear to be getting better at the lightning quick pace we were promised by president Obama. It’s only a matter of time before people begin blaming gas prices and food prices for the struggling economic recovery.

But I will stress one thing, use common sense. There’s not too much Obama can do about the rising gas prices. He’ll talk about investing in clean energy and renewable resources, and while that’s not a bad thing, we have to understand that costs money, keep that in mind for just a few sentences.

Another point the left will likely make is that “windfall” profits from the oil companies must be recouped and their ridiculous cash grabs much be brought to an end.

That’s all fine and dandy except for a.) they don’t have the legal authority to just claim a company is making too much money and then seize their assets and b.) that whole renewable and clean energy thing is going to cost money, who do you suppose is going to pay for it?

I hate to point out the glaringly obvious, but money doesn’t grow on trees. If we all want renewable and clean energy, we better be willing to pay for it, and that payment starts with good ole’ research and development. Because you can’t purchase clean energy if it doesn’t exist, again pointing out the glaringly obvious.

The nice thing about oil companies is they make a lot of money, and they enjoy making a lot of money, and they would like to continue making a lot of money because as previously mentioned they enjoy it. They’re not dumb, they realize that renewables are the future and the money will be there with time, it only makes sense that they begin to adapt to that growing trend and work to produce and invest in renewable energy.

That’s probably why Exxon spent more money on research and development in 2009 than any previous year. That’s also probably why Chevron is spending over half a billion dollars on research.

Valero sees it too; they’ve acquired multiple ethanol plants in the Midwest, and are producing over one billion gallons per year of capacity out of those plants.

BP is there as well, not only have they invested heavily in wind energy, they’ve invested over $4 billion in alternative energy since 2005, that includes a massive investment in 2009 of $55 million to produce bioethanol and biodiesel.

There’s a reason the right always questions the left’s commitment to capitalism, because they don’t seem to understand it. I’ve heard so many people claim that all the oil company’s care about is money, and that’s a problem.

That’s not a problem, it’s a good thing. Allow me to explain.

As we’ve previously established oil companies love money. Who provides them with money? The consumer, so it stands to reason that they should do everything in their power to keep the consumer happy. Now, because they love money, instead of sitting on it or writing fat checks to executives when they make billions, they invest their money in technologies and renewable energy, because they realize that’s where the money will be in the future.

It’s quite simple. Now let’s use some common sense. If we tax the companies that are investing the money in research and development, they’re likely to cut down on their allocations to R&D, which would be devastating to the renewable energy market.

We might all be frustrated by higher gas prices, and as much as I’d like Obama to sweet talk the 13 OPEC countries and attempt to raise production, it’s unlikely. But remember to not fall for the liberals’ oil company scapegoat. The oil companies are the ones investing in the future, without them we wouldn’t have made it as far in renewables as we have today.

Does Obama Really Care?

Obama has gone out of his way the last 58 days to say that he is worried about the oil spill. He’s done a good job of saying that he will work to clean it up, and he’s done a good job of saying he knows who’s “ass to kick.” But in a crisis like this it doesn’t matter what you say, it matters what you do.

It’s been 58 days since the oil spill and Obama finally met with BP executives today. 58 days after the fact! At the most it should have taken him 3 days, but instead Obama opted to publicly trash BP instead of asking how he could help in the cleanup efforts.

And how long did this meeting with Obama last? A whole 20 minutes. Wow Barry way to show you care.

Obama made sure he used fancy words in his address last night to display that he deeply cared about Gulf Coast business owners, and he made sure he used heavy words to describe how he would punish BP. But instead of punishing BP, we should be helping them, at least for right now.

I agree that BP should pay for this mistake, however, we should deal with that afterwards, right now there’s still oil gushing out of that hole, and until the oil stops gushing, Obama should stop insulting and punishing BP. Save the punishing and “ass kicking” for later, worry about plugging the hole now.

A lot of people have asked, what could Obama have done? Obam himself has posed this question. It’s very simple, allow me to lay it out for you…

-Upon hearing of the explosion and leak Obama should have immediately flown to the Gulf and met with the CEO of BP, the Chairman of BP, any other executives, and the leader of the cleanup effort.
-At this meeting he should have asked BP officials what he can do as president to help them. He should have asked, what experts do you need? Do you need the Navy’s assistance? Do you need volunteers?
-Then Obama should have met with business officials from the Gulf and discussed with them how he could help them keep business and stay afloat. He should have asked them for ideas to deal with their imminent loss of business and what they would like to see from BP.
-Then he should have become the face of the disaster, not in a bad way, but in a spokesman type of way. He should have held a presidential address long before 58 days had elapsed, he should have held weekly press conferences on the spill and the efforts BP is implementing to stop the spill.
-Then he should be on the phone with the CEO of BP and the head of the cleanup effort every day of the week to get an update on the situation.
-While all this is going on he should be meeting with republicans and democrats in the House and Senate to work on a new energy bill and to discuss punishment and payback for BP. However, he should not publicly talk about either yet. It is important to get the oil cleaned up before any discussion of punishment or new energy policy is brought to the table. The people of the Gulf Coast couldn’t care less about punishment and new energy policies right now, they just want their ocean back to normal and business as usual. Once that is achieved they will be receptive to new policies and punishment for BP.

Obama failed to take all of those steps. Instead of sitting down and thinking this through and working with BP to fix the problem, he saw an opportunity to play politics. He used Rahm Emmanuel’s motto of “never let a disaster go to waste” and took the opportunity to handle it incorrectly. There is something to be learned from this oil spill, but lets clean up the damn oil first.

–jb

The Current #149

The Current #149
Sunday August 21, 2009
Hosts: Jacob Bodnar and Logan Sparrow

Segments – These are three select topics from our full 75 minute show. The full show is available at the bottom of this post.

Flip Flop on the Public Option
We reported last episode that it appeared the Obama White House had given up on the public option. Unfortunately they didn’t, and they’re blaming the media for making it appear like they did. Plus another Obama supporter invokes the post office when referencing health care, can’t these people recognize gaffes?

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Flag Email Sleeping with the Fishes
Remember that email the White House setup for people to forward “fishy” emails about health care to? Well, it’s gone. Amid pressure for people who enjoy the first amendment, the White House shut it down. They also admitted to sending unwanted emails to people. And this is suppose to be the most “technologically savvy” president?

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Where’s Hillary?
Major foreign policy issue after major foreign policy issue Hillary Clinton has sat on the bench. Two separate hostage situations were taken care of by other people, and this week North Korean representatives will meet with…Bill Richardson. Why is Clinton not partaking in important foreign policy situations?

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

FULL EPISODE

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

DOWNLOAD
64kbps | 96kbps

Subscribe in iTunes

Subscribe via RSS

Links to Stories

The Current #147

The Current #147
Sunday August 9, 2009
Hosts: Jacob Bodnar and Logan Sparrow

Segments – These are three select topics from our full 75 minute show. The full show is available at the bottom of this post.

Heated Health Care Town Halls
Congressmen went back to their districts this week and hosted health care town hall meetings, and they got an earful from their constituents. However, instead of listening to the people and taking note of their beliefs, the left has claimed that they are being paid by the health insurance industry and that their outrage is manufactured.

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

So Much for Lower Taxes
Two Obama officials said this week that they couldn’t guarantee taxes for the middle class wouldn’t go up. This is despite Obama’s claims during the campaign that middle class citizens wouldn’t see a dime of their taxes increased. The interesting aspect of this story is that people were surprised, anyone with a brain should have seen this coming.

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

RIP War on Terrorism
The Obama administration made a rhetoric change this week, they no longer call the War on Terrorism the War on Terrorism. They also said that they are no longer fighting jihadists. Rather they claim they are only fighting Al Qaeda. Jacob and Logan explain why this is a bad rhetoric shift.

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

FULL EPISODE

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

DOWNLOAD
64kbps | 96kbps

Subscribe in iTunes

Subscribe via RSS

Links to Stories

The Bodcast Cap and Trade Special

I spent the entire time complaining about cap and trade.

As I said in the show, my beef with this whole situation isn’t necessarily the terrible legislation that is cap and trade, but rather the blatant disregard for the American people being shown by the democrats attempting to rush this bill through Congress. The job of Congress is not only to legislate, but create good, necessary, and meaningful legislation that is well thought out and complete. By rushing this bill through the House and not allowing any member to read it in full, Congress has not done their job. They have failed us and this isn’t the first time.

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

The Cap and Trade Smoke Screen

On the campaign trail Barack Obama repeatedly said that he would not raise taxes on anyone making under $250,000. He’s already thrown that promise out the window once by signing an increase to the sin tax (an increase on the price of tobacco), but he’s about to break that promise again if he signs Cap and Trade into law.

Many people don’t know cap and trade outside of the media spin zone. The media, and the Obama administration, would like you to believe that cap and trade is a market based initiative to reduce America’s carbon footprint, sounds so environmentally conscious.

The fact of the matter is cap and trade is the exact opposite of market based, the only thing market based about it is the massive regulation it imposes on the free market. As for reducing American’s carbon footprint, that’s not very likely either. An analysis of an earlier cap and trade bill, the Lieberman-Warner bill, showed the program would only reduce CO2 levels by 1.4% by 2050. Then there’s the European cap and trade which actually increased CO2 levels.

However, the glaring issue with cap and trade is the cost to businesses and consumers. To understand this component of cap and trade you have to grasp how it works. So let’s dive in to a quick cap and trade crash course.

Currently if a business wants to emit carbon dioxide they can, they don’t have to pay the government to do so and they don’t need permission from anyone. Under cap and trade this would all change, business who want to emit carbon dioxide would have to purchase a permit from the government.

For some bizarre reason the government believes they own the troposphere (fun fact, they don’t, actually I wouldn’t be surprised if Britain still owns it, after all at one point they basically owned the entire planet). As the self proclaimed owner for the air above our country, the government, under cap and trade, will grant permission to businesses to pollute that area.

However, it will come at a cost; this is where the cap comes in. Under the Waxman-Markey bill the government will begin the program charging $28 per ton of carbon. Each year that price will go up. The idea is that the high price of emitting carbon dioxide will create a massive disincentive to pollute and businesses will curtail their pollution.

So, where the heck is the trade at? This is the part that Washington calls “market based.” If a company purchases too many carbon permits they can trade, or sell, those permits to another business. This way business will not have wasted money on carbon they didn’t emit.

Now, anyone that passed second grade can see that this will increase costs for business. Whether they pollute thousands of tons or just one ton, it will cost them more money. And those added costs will be paid by the consumers through higher energy prices and high prices for basic goods.

The Heritage Foundation found that by 2035 this cap and trade bill will increase electricity costs by 90%, gasoline by 58%, and natural gas by 55%. All told a household of four can expect to pay $1,241 more for energy each year.

Oh, but it doesn’t stop there. Think for a minute, what delivers bread to the grocery store and Snuggies to the local Wal-Mart? It’s not the magic delivery fairly; it’s a massive gas guzzling diesel truck. If gasoline prices go up so will the cost of delivery for nearly every good on store shelves. If the price for delivery goes up, the price stores buy it for goes up. And finally, if the store has to purchase it at a higher price, they will sell it for a higher price. It’s basic economics.

Cap and trade is obviously a bad idea. History tells us it won’t reduce the amount of carbon in the air, and a third grade economics course tells us that it will cost consumers a pretty penny, and in this economic time pennies are looking a lot prettier. So why is the left so hell bent on jamming this massive tax down our throats?

Many will say it’s to further infringe on our civil liberties and businesses freedom to emit carbon dioxide. While that will be the product of cap and trade, I don’t think that’s the reason for the legislation. I also don’t think it has anything to do with saving the earth, after all carbon will barely be reduced.

The one thing this legislation does well is generate revenue. Businesses will be forced to purchase carbon credits; the government will make billions of dollars. They say this money will be reinvested in “green” projects and “green” research, but who actually trusts the government to appropriate money? Revenues from cap and trade will be used for universal health care and all the other socialized programs the left wants to impose upon us.

Think about it, Obama is going to have to raise taxes to pay for universal health care, but people aren’t exactly receptive of higher taxes. However, if he hides it behind a smoke screen like “saving the earth” people don’t notice it. They’ll see their energy bills and grocery bills go up, but most won’t connect the dots back to the government.

When Obama said he wasn’t going to raise taxes on anyone making under $250,000 he knew he was lying through his teeth. He had every intention of raising everyone’s taxes to pay for all his lofty socialized fantasies. He was just planning on hiding those taxes behind an environmental smoke screen, and hope we were all too stupid to notice.

The Current #140

The Current #140
Sunday June 14, 2009
Hosts: Jacob Bodnar and Logan Sparrow

Topics
Available as segments below: Democrats draft their health care plan, North Korea gets yet another slap on the wrist, and San Francisco begins fining people for throwing out food scraps.
Available only in the full episode: Tech companies come out against Obama’s tax plan, Iranian elections are no big surprise, Obama’s auto task forced called bond holder lawyer a “terrorist,” Gaffama of the week via Joe Biden, European Union tilts right while U.S. tilts left, and a boy gets hit by a meteorite.

Democrats Health Care: A Public Deception
The democrats health care bill leaked this week, it’s officially titled the Kennedy-Dodd health care plan, but regardless of who wrote the thing it stinks. Not only will it cost an estimated $1 trillion across a decade, it will also increase taxes by $600 billion. Shock I know. We also discuss how this plan is being sold as increased “competition” when in reality it will lead to a single-payer system (watch this video for proof of that).

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

North Korea: Land of Women’s Sunglasses and Platform Shoes
While sanctions were handed down to North Korea over their missile launch, it was still a slap on the wrist. The Korean’s have said they will continue to weaponize all of their plutonium and any inspection of their ships will be an act of war. They’re going off the deep end yet we continue to use the same non-confrontational policy. We think it’s time for a change of pace.

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

San Francisco Owns Your Food
Thinking about throwing away that leftover chicken? Think again. San Francisco is requiring that all citizens separate their discarded food into a separate compost. That makes for three bins: recyclables, trash, and compost. Even worse the city plans on fining individuals $100 for throwing away leftover food. It’s getting tough to take San Francisco seriously anymore.

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

FULL EPISODE

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

DOWNLOAD
64kbps | 96kbps

Subscribe in iTunes

Subscribe via RSS

Links to Stories

The Current #139

The Current #139
Sunday June 7, 2009
Hosts: Jacob Bodnar and Logan Sparrow

Topics
Available as Segment Below: Iran says Obama’s “beautiful” speech not enough, jobless rate hits 9.4%, Gaffama of the week (says there are 7 million Muslims in U.S.)
Available only in the full episode: Obama gives speech in Egypt, the assassinations of George Tiller and William Long, Obama says he might have to engage with Hezbollah, House GOP offers weak spending cuts, still no definitive punishment for North Korea, Chavez says Obama is more left wing, GOP reveals briefing info, political pattern found in stimulus tour, Harry Reid says he hasn’t and won’t read Sotomayor’s opinions, Oil spikes to $70 a barrel, Newsweek editor says Obama “sort of like God,” man sues mother for his sawed off finger.

Iran not Happy with Obama’s Speech
Iran responded to Obama’s speech in Egypt by saying America was “hated” in the Middle East and Obama’s “beautiful” words could not change that. Jacob and Logan wonder, who cares if Iran hates us, isn’t that kind of expected? They explain.

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Jobless Numbers Climb, Higher than White House Projected
The unemployment rate hit 9.4% in May, which happens to be higher than the White House’s projection back in February if the stimulus wasn’t enacted. And guess what? The stimulus kinda was enacted. I’m sure you’re all shocked it’s not working. Jacob and Logan also discuss Microsoft’s latest announcement that if Obama’s foreign profits tax gets passed they’ll move more jobs overseas.

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Gaffama: How Many Muslims Live in the U.S.?
During his speech in Egypt, Obama claimed there were seven million Muslims living in the United States. He was sorta close, there’s 2.35 million. In all fairness he did say nearly seven million.

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

FULL EPISODE

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

DOWNLOAD
64kbps | 96kbps

Subscribe in iTunes

Subscribe via RSS

Links to Stories

The Current #138 UPDATE: Obama’s Date Money

The Current #138
Hosts: Jacob Bodnar and Logan Sparrow

Topics
Available as audio segments below: North Korea executes another nuclear test, Obama nominates Sonia Sotomayor to Supreme Court, and why Michigan’s tourism isn’t booming.
Available only in the full episode: Obama announces cyber security czar, Energy Secretary recommends painting all roofs white to stop global warming, Gaffama of the Week (Obama learns about Defense Department program for first time at burger joint), gas prices on the rise, Ahmadinejad gives out potatoes to get votes, transportation secretary says he needs to coerce people out of cars, GM likely to head into bankruptcy, every household owns $500,000 in federal debt, U.S. sales tax gets a new look, and Ohio man arrested for mowing park grass

North Korea Disregards the U.N…again
Two months ago when North Korea broke a U.N. resolution by test launching missiles, the U.N. took a week to pass down their punishment; a strongly worded “presidential statement.” Well that didn’t work. Not only did North Korea launch several missiles they also conducted another underground nuclear test. What can we do to keep the North from becoming a nuclear power?

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Obama Nominates Legislator to the Supreme Court
Okay, so he didn’t actually nominate a legislator, but Sonia Sotomayor was on the Court of Appeals and according to her that’s where policy is made. Outside of that total disregard for the role of the courts, a quote from Sotomayor circa 2001 shows that she seems to be more interested in her past experiences than the facts when judging a case. Keeping those two factors in mind, should the Republicans try and block Sonia?

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Why Michigan Tourism is Nearly Non-Existent
While discussing global warming, Jacob and Logan went way off topic and began discussing Michigan’s brilliant plan to attract visitors to the state; Pure Michigan commercials. If you haven’t seen this marketing breakthrough you must. They advertise great Michigan attractions, like water and grass.

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

FULL EPISODE

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

DOWNLOAD
64kbps | 96kbps

Subscribe in iTunes

Subscribe in RSS

Links to Stories

UPDATE: In this episode we talked about the Obama’s night on the town to New York. And surprise, I was right, the taxpayers footed a huge bill for the night. The New York Post reports:

Taxpayers footed the bill for the big night on the town, which included a total of at least $24,000 for the three aircraft used to ferry the Obamas, aides and reporters to New York and back. Dinner costs and orchestra seat tickets — at $96.50 apiece — were paid by the Obamas.

Eh, so I was wrong about the food and the tickets, the rest was paid by you and me. I guess I would have no problem footing the bill for security, although ideally I’d like that to be reimbursed by the Obama’s, but I have no problem crying foul when Obama doesn’t pay back the country for the flight there, after all it wasn’t official business, it was a date.

And footing the bill for reporters? Really? We paid for reporters to tag along so they could report on a tabloid story. Please, that’s a huge waste of money. And aides? What aides need to accompany him on a date, unless that’s referring to security.

Obama’s New Emission Standards: A Load of Bull

Ya know those people that walk behind the horses in the parades and clean up their poop?

We need someone like that for Obama. A guy who follows him around and picks up all the bull crap the President spews while giving press conferences. Honestly, whoever is writing the garbage running across his teleprompter is officially the most annoying human being ever conceived.

This morning Obama announced his new emissions standards. After all, the first ones worked fantastic, they only resulted in the near demise of the three auto companies. Arguing that those standards didn’t have a financial impact on the big three is like arguing that beans don’t make you pass gas. There’s no question that increased fuel standards from the government made the big three scramble to make cars that people liked and met the requirements. Not to mention the cost it took to develop the means to make certain cars meet those levels.

Obama admitted that the new plan would tack on $1,300 to the cost of a vehicle by 2016, but who are we kidding there’s no question it’ll be more. It’s kinda like how Washington said we would make money from the TARP “investments.” With the way GM and Chrysler are looking, and with the unions looking like they’re going to have a large share of both companies, the additional cost will well exceed $1,300.

Obama claims that the average American will make up that cost difference by purchasing less gas, saying it’ll pay for itself in three years, but that’s hardly the point. Consumers can make that decision on their own now. If they want to spend more on a car that gets better gas mileage assuming they’ll make up the difference by consuming less gas, that’s their decision to make.

However, there are a large chunk of people who would rather pay less for the car, and then drive more conservatively. Obama is effectively taking away that option.

Obama also claims that everyone wins. But as everyone knows, or should know, if the government is behind it, chances are everyone will lose.

“The fact is, everyone wins,” Obama said during a Rose Garden ceremony attended by representatives of the auto industry and environmental groups as well as state and federal lawmakers.

“Consumers pay less for fuel, which means less money going overseas and more money to save or spend here at home. The economy as a whole runs more efficiently by using less oil and producing less pollution,” he said. “And companies like those here today have new incentives to create the technologies and the jobs that will provide smarter ways to power our vehicles.”

Funny, he didn’t mention the auto companies. They are the ones that will have to develop ways for their cars to meet these standards, they’ll be shelling out the upfront cost, and what happens if no one buys the cars? The companies are just screwed I guess.

Obama also skews the “win” for consumers by claiming they’ll pay less for fuel. Which is not really true at all. For starters they’ll have to pay more for the car; second, gas prices are going up not down, the cost of fuel is getting even more expensive. And with no plan in sight for an alternative, and with Obama and the democrats stonewalling any drilling proposals, I would expect gas to be routinely over $3.50 a gallon by the time 2010 rolls around. By 2016 who knows where it will be.

Aside from paying more for the vehicle, consumers will also be getting less for what they pay for.

Why do cars that get 30mpg cost more than cars that get 20mpg, because it costs more to make a car that gets better gas mileage. They both use the same fuel – gasoline – but one car uses that fuel more efficiently. Determining how to do that costs money. Companies can develop engines that use a smaller amount of fuel to perform the normal functions of a car. But again, it costs money. Hence why it costs more for a 30mpg car.

So companies will be faced with two options; develop more advanced engines that use fuel more efficiently or make the car lighter taking out additional luxury features that weight down the car.

The problem with option number one is that consumers will no longer have the choice of a more fuel efficient vehicle, the government is taking that away, so auto companies can’t charge too much more for them. I would fully expect that the development of in-car luxuries will slow and the fun gadgets you might expect in your automobile in seven years won’t be there. The easiest way to make a car more fuel efficient is to make it weigh less, and that’s precisely what companies will do.

Companies can also make cars lighter by decreasing the number of airbags, the amount of material separating the passengers from the outside world and various other techniques that would reduce the safety of the vehicle. In fact the board on energy and environmental systems estimates that CAFE standards played a part in 1,300 to 2,600 additional traffic fatalities in 1993 alone.

So Obama’s fuel standard plan can be summed up with three points…
-More cost and hassle for car companies
-Less choice for consumers
-Doing something the market would do, or already have done, if the demand was there

Sounds like a lose, lose, lose to me.

–jb