Calling All Sports Fans

I know I have some sports fans who read this blog. I mean you guys can’t be 100% invested in politics and current events, there needs to be something in your life that keeps you sane.

For all those interested, I just launched a new sports blog and netcast with two of my good friends the other day. Currently it’s strictly a blog, in May our weekly netcast/podcast (whichever term you prefer, I like netcast) will begin.

Check it out – www.JacobJacobDrew.com

Enjoy!

–jb

House Passes the Stimulus that No One Read UPDATE: Tom Price Looks at the Bill

John Boehner has it right. Not a single member of that body read the entire package, yet 246 members voted yes. How can you vote for something that you haven’t even read? Especially when it contains a trillion dollars in spending.

Yet again the Republicans gave not a single vote in favor of the bill, and seven Democrats sided with the Republicans.

Here’s what I love. Robert Gibbs, Obama’s Press Secretary, made this comment today.

Robert Gibbs reacted by citing another number: “3.5 million jobs that we look forward to saving or creating.”

How the hell does anyone know!? No one has read the bill. God only knows what’s in it.

The bill now advances to the Senate where a vote might come tonight. I’ll be interested to see if it passes the 60 vote threshold, Reid will need the support of the “three musketeers” if he wants this to be a done deal by tomorrow morning.

UPDATE:

–jb

Sheltering the Stimulus

Something smells very funky about this stimulus plan.

I’ve always thought it was a bad idea, but the new “compromised” bill from the House and Senate has a stench to it that is worrying me very much. It has nothing to do with what’s actually in the bill, very few people are privileged enough to have even read it, it has to do with how Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid are handling the situation.

First, they promise the bill will be online for the public to read at least 48 hours before a vote takes place. The bill wasn’t placed online until last night around 11pm and a vote is expected today. Obviously that’s not 48 hours.

The reason the Democrats didn’t get the bill up in time is because they were converting it to unsearchable PDF files. Usually a bill is placed online and you can search through the text by typing in keywords. However, with this stimulus bill three out of the four PDF files are images, meaning there’s no search functionality.

Why would the most open and transparent Congress and presidency not want the people to search their bill? Probably because there’s some controversial items. If the bill is online for…lets say 20 hours before a vote, someone could easily use the search functionality and find all the ridiculous stuff the Dems crammed in there. However, if it’s online for 20 hours with no search functionality you basically have to read the bill. And at 1,071 pages you’d have to read 54 pages an hour for 20 hours straight. It is impossible to read the stimulus in its entirety before the House votes on it.

Oh but it gets better.

Republicans have been calling for the vote to take place at a later time, maybe over the weekend or on Monday. The Democrats have scoffed at that idea without giving a reason as to why a vote shouldn’t be delayed.

Well they’ve found a reason now.

John Culberson of Texas says that a vote on the stimulus has to take place today because Speaker of the House Pelosi is leaving on an 8-day trip to Europe tomorrow.

Give me a second to grab a tissue to wipe my tears.

I thought this bill is suppose to save the economy, clearly Pelosi could cancel a trip to Europe for that!

What exactly is Speaker Pelosi doing in Europe that she has to go. According to Drudge…

Pelosi is hoping to lead a delegation to Europe; there’s a meeting with the Pope and an award from an Italian legislative group.

So basically increasing her ego. Certainly nothing urgent, certainly nothing she couldn’t cancel.

I’ve yet to read the bill or see any detailed summary of it, but this certainly smells fishy. Let me lay it out for you one more time.

-The bill is 1,071 pages long making it impossible to read in less than 24 hours and large enough to hide some radical stuff
-The Democrats promised the bill would be online 48 hours before a vote, if they vote today (depending on the time) it will only have been online for around 20 hours.
-The bill, unlike every other bill that goes through Congress, is not searchable online
-Negotiations on the bill took place exclusively between Democrats and Obama staffers, Republicans weren’t invited
-The bill was distributed to K Street lobbyists before congressional offices
-According to Democrats the bill has to be voted on today because Pelosi is leaving for Europe
-Democrats and Republicans are teed off that they don’t have time to read the full text

This is a very concerning and frightening situation. To think that Congress would authorize a trillion dollars in spending without the entire delegation reading the bill is mind numbing. This irresponsibility must come to an end.

And ya know who should lead that charge. The guy who’s been talking all the bipartisan rhetoric over the last month…Barack Obama. Where is the outcry from the White House over these outrageous actions?

–jb

So Much for a Smooth Transition UPDATE: More Bad News for Obama

Before he was actually inaugurated, the press was hailing Obama for doing a superb job on his transition into office. He had selected the right cabinet members, he hadn’t sparred with Bush over anything, and it looked as if he’d hit the ground running on January 20.

I think it’s time for all the news media to offer up a retraction to those stories.

Judd Gregg pulled his name for nomination to Obama’s cabinet today, marking the third cabinet member to withdrawal from a position. The first two were for corruption issues, the third is because Obama wants to radicalize the census. Funny how the two corruption issues fall on Democrat’s shoulders, while the lone Republican quits because Obama’s philosophy doesn’t jibe with his.

After we add in Timothy Geithner to the mix we see a bleak transition picture. Maybe, just maybe, Bush was the half of the transition making it successful. Just sayin’.

For all those people during the campaign that said William Ayers and Jeremiah Wright were irrelevant…bite your tongue. I never held Obama responsible for what those two said, but rather for his terrible judgment in connecting with those two in the first place. Now it’s showing. Obama doesn’t have good judgment, and these three would-be cabinet members prove that.

Let’s not forget all the bipartisan bull he’s spewed, while turning the other way when it came down to businesses. As I wrote before, Republicans weren’t even invited to the Senate-House stimulus compromise. They weren’t even told it was going on!

We can also scratch the “tough on lobbyists” rhetoric off the list as well. Besides already making an exception for a former lobbyist, he’s also let K Street lobbyists get a peak at the stimulus bill before congressional offices.

We’re receiving E-mails from Capitol Hill staffers expressing frustration that they can’t get a copy of the stimulus bill agreed to last night at a price of $789 billion. What’s more, staffers are complaining about who does have a copy: K Street lobbyists. E-mails one key Democratic staffer: “K Street has the bill, or chunks of it, already, and the congressional offices don’t.

I’m not saying that Obama is directly responsible for the lobbyists seeing it before congressional staffers, but weren’t Pelosi and Reid suppose to lend a helping hand on the quest for hope ‘n change?

All I ask is for the media to hold Obama accountable. I, and other bloggers, will continue to put pressure on the media to actually ask tough questions and not let things slide by. And I will say that some have done a good job thus far. But if this were Bush making all these mistakes his first month in office, he’d already be deemed the dumbest man alive and the worst president ever.

UPDATE: When I was writing the part above about how there are some reporters that have done a good job thus far, I almost mentioned Jake Tapper from ABC News, because he’s someone who has stood out in my mind as someone who has leveled tough questions at Obama.

Well, Tapper has come up big again. It was reported on Drudge yesterday that Obama said the CEO of Caterpillar would begin to rehire employees if the stimulus were passed. Unfortunately for Obama the CEO of Caterpillar said just the opposite when Obama left today’s news conference.

Asked if the stimulus package would be able to stop the 22,000 layoffs or not, Owens said, “I think realistically no. The truth is we’re going to have more layoffs before we start hiring again”

“It is going to take some time before that stimulus bill” means re-hiring, he said.

Watch the clip at the link, Obama says he’s confident the rehiring bug will pass to other businesses if the stimulus passes, yet he can’t even get one business to say they’ll rehire.

–jb

Stimulus Deal Reached

The democrats have reached a compromise on the competing stimulus plans from the House and Senate. Notice I how I say the Democrats, because they were the only ones allowed into the meeting. Obama had staff there, Reid and Pelosi were obviously there, but somehow the Republican’s didn’t get a seat at the table.

Republicans have caught the Democrats in a midnight “stimulus” power play that seeks to cut Republican conferees out of the House-Senate negotiations to resolve a final version of the Obama “stimulus” package. Staff members from the offices of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) met last night to put together the “stimulus” conference report.

They intend to attempt to shove this $1.3 trillion spending bill through in the dead of the night without Republican input so floor action can take place in both chambers on Thursday.

That’s interesting because I could have sworn Obama said these things at his press conference Monday night

“It’s a plan that is already supported by businesses representing almost every industry in America, by both the Chamber of Commerce and the AFL-CIO. It contains input, ideas and compromises from both Democrats and Republicans.”

“And I’m happy to get good ideas from across the political spectrum, from Democrats and Republicans.”

“…making sure that [Republicans] were invited here to the White House to talk about the economic recovery plan, all those were not designed simply to get some short-term votes. They were designed to try to build up some trust over time.”

“And whether we’re Democrats or Republicans, surely there’s got to be some capacity for us to work together, not agree on everything, but at least set aside small differences to get things done.”

He sure threw out a lot of bipartisan rhetoric in that press conference didn’t he? Most of which wasn’t followed through on when the final stimulus compromise was going down. Obama could have asked Pelosi and Reid to bring Republicans into the negotiating room and work through the night to get a compromise, but he didn’t.

Despite the Republicans not even having a say in the final “compromised” bill, Vice President Joe Biden thinks it’ll pass with bipartisan support.

On a trip to Pennsylvania, where he stumped on behalf of the economic recovery plan, Biden told reporters: “We are going to have this bill, hopefully, by today.”

I understand being optimistic but that’s a bit too optimistic. Saying that would assume that the House can vote it through tonight and the Senate could vote it through, without a filibuster, as well. I don’t think the GOP is too receptive of this bill after being shut out of negotiations.

But let’s talk about the compromised bill.

First off, they did cut some money from it, that’s a good start. The total now sits at $789 billion, down from up to $838 billion. According to Harry Reid, a third of the bill is tax cuts (actually tax credits, I’m assuming there are no rate cuts in the bill). According to reports the bill falls short in money for school modernization. Most likely because some moderate Republicans in the Senate stood against that measure and would vote if it was included.

Oh but it gets so much better. There was talk before the compromise that the Senate bill included some creepy stuff about health care, including forcing doctors to get approval for procedures by the government. According to reports, the new compromised bill goes further and begins to ration health care.

Rep. John Shadegg (R.-Ariz.) issued a letter to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D.-Calif.) asking language be stripped from the bill to eliminate the creation of a $1.1 billion government agency he says could deny lifesaving medical treatment to Americans under a nationalized health care system.

The provision at issue is one placed into the bill by House Appropriations Chairman Rep. David Obey (D.-Ohio) to create a “Federal Coordinating Council.” The council would be established to conduct “Comparative Effectiveness” research on the efficiency of health care treatments.

“In other countries where they’ve done this research they’ve used it to deny care…It’s preparing America, at least in this instance, the worst aspects of universal health care and that’s government rationing,” Shadegg said.

The provision in the bill would allow the council to review procedures and then those “that are found to be less effective and in some cases, more expensive, will no longer be prescribed.”

There’s this distorted notion that the government has the people in mind and, unlike the big health care corporations, they don’t care about money. That’s false. If the government is providing health care they’ll find the most cost effective way to do it. And if that means cutting procedures that cost too much, despite their effectiveness, so be it.

This bill doesn’t have to be on Obama’s desk until February 16, at least that’s Obama’s due date. I sincerely hope that for the sake of democracy Congress spends that time wisely and debates this bill. Most of this spending won’t even happen until 2010, they have time. As I’ve said before it would be irresponsible to pass an 800+ page bill that spends nearly a $1 trillion in a matter of days. They need to give time to Congressmen to at least pretend like they’ve read it.

–jb

Another Senator Comes out in Favor of Fairness Doctrine

Debbie Stabenow isn’t alone in her quest to bring back the fairness doctrine. Actually she’s not really on that quest anymore, she backed off her call for hearings on “radio accountability.” Not surprised, after emailing her office about her calls for the hearings I got a very nondescript email back saying she’d keep my opinions “in mind” if a vote came to the floor, key word being “if.”

Taking Stabenow’s place as leader of the fairness doctrine pact is Senator Tom Harkin, who appeared on the Bill Press radio show and praised Press for his op-ed about the fairness doctrine.

I love being with you, and thanks again for all you do to get the truth and the facts out there. By the way, I read your Op-Ed in the Washington Post the other day. I ripped it out, I took it into my office and said ‘there you go, we gotta get the Fairness Doctrine back in law again.’

Someones got a man crush on Bill Press. It’s no problem though, after all I admittedly have a man crush on Jim DeMint.

Press went on to basically blame the big bad radio executives for shutting down all progressive talk across the country.

Alright, well good for you. You know, we gotta work on that, because they are just shutting down progressive talk from one city after another. All we want is, you know, some balance on the airwaves, that’s all. You know, we’re not going to take any of the conservative voices off the airwaves, but just make sure that there are a few progressives and liberals out there, right?

That’s the big mistake Press and other fairness doctrine backers make on this issue. Executives are in the business of making money, they put on the air what brings in cash. If anyone listened to liberal talk radio, it’d be on the air, because it would make good money with advertisers. Press has pointed to Obama 1260 in Washington D.C. as an example. Obama 1260 got abysmal ratings as progressive talk. At times it didn’t even get a point in the ratings. It got up to a 0.4 in Fall of 2008 but fell back down to a 0.1 in the winter of 2008. And that’s in Washington D.C., one of the more liberal areas in the country.

The fact of the matter is liberal talk radio doesn’t garner ratings. It’s not as if it hasn’t been tried. Air America had millions dumped into it, and it failed.

If Press is so worried about the talk radio slant, why doesn’t he argue in favor of the government overseeing network television news, and determining if it is “fair.” I’m not advocating that, but it would make sense using Press’ logic.

When reading this post some might say, “well of course you’re against the fairness doctrine Jacob you’re going into radio.” Stop and think about it for a minute. I have a lot to gain if the fairness doctrine is put into place.

If the fairness doctrine is reinstated conservative talkers will make the leap from the airwaves to the internet. I’ve been broadcasting on the internet for three years now, I know how to put a show online and get it out there. When these radio personalities jump to the internet they’ll look to people like me to get their operation up and running. If I make the right career choices the fairness doctrine could be very fruitful for me. But that doesn’t mean I support it. I don’t support issues for selfish reasons.

I still think the fairness doctrine is too left-wing for most, and I don’t really think it has a shot of passing the Senate, and if Obama is true to his word he won’t sign it.

So I guess it’s just all talk right now.

–jb

Senate Passes Stimulus, Let the Battle Begin

The Senate passed the stimulus today, I just heard the news and I am literally sitting on a bus while writing this. Technology is an amazing thing, I can surf the internet while on a moving bus.

Anyway, the vote was 61-37, the same three GOP senators that voted for cloture voted in favor of the bill. Those three would be Susan Collins, Olympia Snowe, and Arlen Specter. To be honest I don’t know much about Specter or Collins, but I do know that Snowe is a more left-leaning republican, after all she’s from Maine. I’m not calling her a liberal, but she’s certainly no conservative.

Either way, the Senate bill was a massive $838 billion while the House bill only stood at $819 billion (I never thought I’d use the word only in front of a number that large). Nancy Pelosi just said yesterday that she wasn’t happy with all of the provisions in the Senate bill, and now the two chambers have to reconcile their differences and come up with a bill before Presidents Day Weekend.

Let’s hope that the House republicans stand their ground on this battle and continue to oppose this massive waste of money. But the final fate of this bill lies in the hands of the Senate GOP, and so long as the three musketeers continue to vote for the stimulus we conservatives have little hope of it dying.

–jb

Obama’s Primetime News Conference

I’ll keep you updated tonight as Obama tries to sell his massive stimulus to the American people.

UPDATE 8:37PM: Obama says his measure of success for his plan is if it saves or creates 4 million jobs. I have a feeling it’s going to fail them. Let’s make sure we hold him to that benchmark.

UPDATE 8:31PM: Obama says that he would “love to not spend money right now.” Then why not craft a plan that spends less money with the same amount of effectiveness? But he’s pushed aside the Republicans plan that did just that, saying it only gave tax cuts to the wealth and corporations.

UPDATE 8:29PM: Obama says the reason we got into this mess was because banks took high risks with lenders. Yeah, because they were forced to by the government, through the Community Reinvestment Act; and by ACORN, where Obama helped train workers twice.

UPDATE 8:27PM: Obama asks, why wouldn’t we want to computerize health care records? Well, it goes back to the money issue (ya know because we don’t have any), but also because health care providers and hospitals are already moving to computerized records, without the government forcing them to or handing them a check to do it. The computerized records are happening on their own, without the government.

UPDATE 8:23PM: Obama is saying that he’s open to listening to Republicans who want to tweak tax cuts, yet none of the “tax cuts” in the stimulus are actual rate cuts.

He also says that the people who decry this as “wasteful government spending” can’t really call it that because Bush drove us into a deficit. Does that make sense to anyone? Obama says he inherited the economic mess and the deficit, yeah that’s true, but I want to know what he’s going to do to fix it.

Obama asks why making government buildings more energy efficient is a waste of money. He says we’re creating jobs immediately. That’s true, but they are permanent jobs. Once those buildings are energy efficient those people are out of jobs. He says “why is that a waste of money?” It may not be, but I think the main reason is because we don’t have any money to spend. Any deficit spending is wasteful spending.

UPDATE 8:22PM: Obama says he’s been “consistently civil” in regards to republicans and bipartisanship. Uhh, anyone remember the “I won” quote?

UPDATE 8:20PM: Obama is asked about the difficulty of bipartisanship. He says he believes the American people understand that it will take time to breakdown “bad habits.” I would have more sympathy is Obama didn’t setup the belief that it would change overnight.

UPDATE 8:18PM: Obama is flopping like a fish on Iran, I’m not really sure what the heck he’s talking about right now. He says we need to talk tough and act tough with them, yet he says we need to use diplomacy and there’s a possibly of a “relationship of mutual respect.”

UPDATE 8:16PM: Reuters sucks! Journalist there switches the topic to Iran. Uhhh, I’d like to hear more about the economy. Iran can wait a few minutes. Although I do think that ultimately Iran will be the biggest issue for Obama during his first term.

UPDATE 8:15PM: Obama has been answering this question from the AP for six minutes now. He’s grandstanding. I honestly think he’s in a groove and is afraid of taking more questions.

UPDATE 8:12PM: Obama says that “most economists, almost unanimously” think that the government needs to intervene into the economy. I guess it depends on your definition of intervening. If tax cuts are intervening than yes, but I don’t see it that way. I don’t think the argument is between intervening or not, it’s between spending money and cutting taxes.

Obama says that the $800 billion wasn’t a number he “plucked out of a hat.” He says that he talked to economists to get the number. Sorry, I don’t buy that. The cost of the TARP bill, $700 billion, was picked out of thin air, and I think this stimulus number was as well.

UPDATE 8:10PM: Obama brings up the example of Japan. Not a very good example for him to bring up. He mentions the “lost decade” in which Japan saw no economic growth. That’s true, but Obama fails to mention that Japan passed 10 stimulus plans during that time.

UPDATE 8:06PM: Obama says the plan that passes Congress needs to be “big enough and bold enough.” What exactly is “big enough and bold enough?”

Obama says the stimulus does not include a single “pet project” or “earmark.” I guess he forgot the lead hazard reduction and $600 million for an energy efficient federal motor vehicle fleet. How exactly does that stimulate the economy? Continuing by saying that the plan is “not perfect” and saying he can’t promise everything in the plan will work. Obama says he inherited a deficit of $1 trillion, so his plan is to spend another trillion.

UPDATE: 8:04PM: Obama says “only government” can break this “vicious cycle.” He says that government is the only entity left that has the resources to get us out of this mess. Unfortunately that’s not true. The government is $1.2 trillion in the hole. The government doesn’t have money to spend, each dollar they spend from here on out continues to devalue our currency, setting us up for failure in years to come.

Obama continues by saying that tax cuts alone cannot get us out of this mess, especially tax cuts for the wealthy. Obama, like many liberals, apparently didn’t read the GOP’s alternative plan which cut the income tax rate by 5% for everyone, and increase the child tax credit as well as many other tax credits that effects middle class families.

UPDATE 8:03PM: Obama begins his press conference stating that we have lost 500,000+ jobs last month. While that’s true, it happened during massive spending policies. Let’s try something different.

The Obama Debt Plan UPDATE: Stimulus Passes Cloture

UPDATE: The stimulus package has passed cloture, meaning it received more than 60 votes, so the debate ends. This is a procedural vote so it doesn’t mean the bill has passed, it simply means that debating on the bill has come to a close.

The vote was 61-36, the three GOP senators that were part of the compromise talks voted to end debate. They were Olympia Snowe, Susan Collins, and Arlen Specter. The final vote on the bill will come tomorrow, I think everyone expects it to pass along party lines, with the exception of Snowe, Collins, and Specter.

Bloomberg published a startling number today.

$9.7 trillion. That’s how much the U.S. taxpayers are in for if this stimulus plan passes the Senate.

For all the visual learners out there that’s $9,700,000,000,000. That’s a lot of zeros. That’s also enough to pay off 90% of the nation’s home mortgages and enough to pay off about 90% of our total national debt.

The worst part is only about $1.7 trillion of that large sum has been approved by elected officials.

Only the stimulus package to be approved this week, the $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program passed four months ago and $168 billion in tax cuts and rebates approved in 2008 have been voted on by lawmakers. The remaining $8 trillion in commitments are lending programs and guarantees, almost all under the authority of the Fed and the FDIC. The recipients’ names have not been disclosed.

So the Fed and FDIC, who aren’t elected officials, have guaranteed $8 trillion of our money to failed institutions. And from the looks of Wall Street and banks right now, it doesn’t appear to be working. So what’s the solution? Well, in the government’s twisted world they use the mantra, if at first you don’t succeed, try, try again.

The New York Times is reporting that TARP II is on the way, and it’s a whole helluva lot fatter than TARP version one or the stimulus.

This week, President Obama and his Treasury secretary, Timothy F. Geithner, will prepare the country for the next, and far more difficult, step: another attempt to fill the huge hole blown in the center of the nation’s financial system.

No one has yet put a price tag on that effort. But the administration’s diagnosis of what went wrong with the first attempt to right the financial system — that it was too small, and that the problem has ballooned in recent months — suggests that the next effort will almost certainly entail a far bigger commitment of taxpayer dollars than the $350 billion left from last year’s $700 billion effort to right the system, and probably far more than the stimulus package.

How stupid can one system be. Let me remind everyone of the government’s track record on the economy in the past year.

-Summer rebate checks. Result: Failed miserably, people saved the money instead of spending it
-TARP I Part A ($350 billion). Result: Banks misspent the money, Washington slammed them, banks continued to collapse
-TARP I Part B ($350 billion). Result: Banks continued to misspend the money, Washington slammed them, banks continue to collapse
-Auto Bailout. Result: Automakers GM and Chrysler have continued to layoff workers, will say they need more money in their report due February 17.

So things haven’t been going too good for Washington. But instead of realizing that their spending doesn’t have much of an effect on the economy, they decided the reason nothing worked was because it was all too small.

That’s frightening.

If $9.7 trillion is too small, what’s just right? $12 trillion? $20 trillion? At what point does Washington realize they don’t have the money to spend. We went into this economic mess already in debt, we never had money to spend in the first place.

Meanwhile Obama is attempting to drum up support for the stimulus and TARP II by doing the only thing he knows how to do, give a stump speech.

Obama is traveling to Elkhart, Indiana where he will hold a town hall meeting about the stimulus package. Don’t get me wrong, I like the idea of taking this issue to the people (after all it’s their money) but Obama, and every other politician in Washington, have shown no respect for taxpayer money; why should we listen to anything he has to say?

The reason I dislike the idea of Obama traveling to Elkhart is because I can already predict what the scene will look like. And if I’m wrong I’ll call myself out on it.

First, he’ll be standing either in front of a sign that says “recovery and reinvestment for America” or he’ll have a podium that says something along those lines. He’ll give a speech, probably won’t take any questions, and it’ll be filled with the same rhetoric and fear he’s spewed over the last several days. And of course he’ll have a teleprompter. I predict that Obama will talk at the crowd, not with the crowd.

Maybe I’ll be wrong, I kinda hope I am, but Obama is in his element giving speeches and he’s never been good with direct questions from an audience. And this is not the time to be fumbling with answers.

Whatever Obama says today in Elkhart, and however it is presented, doesn’t really matter in the grand scheme of things. After Obama’s speech the stimulus will still be too large and TARP II will Congressional fist fight waiting to happen.

–jb

The Current #124

The Current #124
Saturday February 7, 2009

Burning Question
This week’s burning question is stripped from the headlines (kinda sounds like ‘Law & Order’). Michigan Democratic Senator Debbie Stabenow suggested this week that the fairness doctrine be reinstated. So that’s the question, should the fairness doctrine be brought back?

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Here’s how you can answer…
Post a comment on this episode’s post
Post a text/video response on the YouTube video
Email us at question@thecurrentpodcast.com
At-reply us on twitter, username tcpodcast

Government Hypocrisy
This week Barack Obama capped the pay of financial executives receiving TARP funds. He said they needed to stop getting “rewarded for failure.” Gee Barack, wasn’t it the government who rewarded failed institutions. And despite getting paid six figures while honing a 12% approval rating, Congress, namely Barney Frank, is now considering extending that pay cap to all U.S. businesses. Good lord, who is going to want to run a business here anymore?

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Stabenow’s Fairness
After 20 years of conservative domination on the radio dial, mainly because liberal talk radio is painful to listen to (even for liberals), Michigan Democrat Debbie Stabenow said on a nationally syndicated radio show this week that she thought it was time to bring back the fairness doctrine. That might have something to do with Stabenow’s husband, who is a liberal talk radio executive.

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Cher Doesn’t Know
Our sound clip of the week features one very washed up singer; Cher. In this clip she talks about how Obama has the “spirit” to do things that no man could possibly do. Maybe he’ll be able to fly with all that spirit, that’d be cool. Cher also says how republican rule almost “killed her.” Yeah…right…

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

FULL EPISODE

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

DOWNLOAD 64kbps | 96kbps

SUBSCRIBE (ITUNES)

SUBSCRIBE (RSS)

LINKS TO STORIES